One Marine's View ......
The failure of the war does not rest at the hands of the brave troops who patrol every day. It lies with top military leadership and politicians, who have effectively choked our troops so badly that their mission has become impossible.
“I cannot emphasize just how badly the pullout date has ruined our efforts over here,” said Evan. “Down to the lowest soldier, there is a very palpable sense that everything we’ve done is too little, too late.”
As many leaders and politicians continue to plead with a public weary to continue their support for the war, they say, as they said similarly during the war in Vietnam, that “the deaths of our soldiers should not be in vain.”
I disagree. The death of a brother in arms, while tragic and equally heartbreaking, should not be used as a political tool. The fallen heroes of this war are lost forever and will never see a battlefield again. They should not be used to further justify its expansion.
There is an economic theory that supports my reasoning: It’s called a sunk cost dilemma. The theory presents a problem of having to choose between ending an activity immediately or choosing to continue with an uncertain outcome that already involves considerable investment. The investment, whether it be time, money, or in the case of the Afghan war, lives, can never be recovered, and is called a sunk cost.
I believe that we should allow our soldiers to be able to fight this war. As Lt Col. Christian Cabaniss tells his Marines in the documentary Obama’s War, “Make no mistake, we are experts in the application of violence.”
Despite being experts at warfare, the military, much like a professional boxer, will never win a fight when their hands are tied behind their back. Unfortunately, it is our own Generals and politicians that have done the tying.
“We’ve embraced the counterinsurgency (COIN) doctrine without remembering to maintain the true power of the US military, which is an unstoppable killing machine,” Evan told me. “Now the buzz words are ‘development’ [and] ‘partnership’. These things brief well, but they must be used hand in hand with a tolerant and permissive ROE that allows us to flex our full potential when we need to.”
Read it all here. http://www.businessinsider.com/one-marines-views-on-afghanistan-201...
Comment
Comment by Jim B on September 3, 2012 at 11:05am Exactly Greg. Let them win or bring them home.
I agree with this article. Either fight to win or get out. I am tired of hearing about "friendly" Afghan forces opening fire and killing our troops, blue on green (or green on blue?), as I've heard it called. Even Russia advised a year ago to get out of the country, we can't win. Of course, the USSR could not win because we were backing the rebels. A slightly different story.
Loretta Rebeck commented on Political Chips's blog post Breaking: While all eyes were on Oklahoma…Senators approve amnesty bill
Leslie Schmidt posted a blog post
Angelo H Mino commented on Angelo H Mino's blog post The Wrong Way to Reform Immigration
Mary C. Weaver commented on Dave King's blog post Barack Insane Obama: More Conqueror And Ruler Than President
W Dale Russell commented on Political Chips's blog post Breaking: While all eyes were on Oklahoma…Senators approve amnesty bill© 2013 Created by Political Chips.
You need to be a member of Political CHIPS to add comments!
Join Political CHIPS